| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol
Polarized.
965
   |
Posted - 2013.09.03 21:14:00 -
[1] - Quote
Needs more Jesus feature...
Putting work in since 2010. |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol
Polarized.
965
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 21:14:00 -
[2] - Quote
Custom probe formations are good, i guess.
Putting work in since 2010. |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol
Polarized.
966
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 15:06:00 -
[3] - Quote
Changing the names of the industrial was a dumb decision.
Putting work in since 2010. |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol
Polarized.
967
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 21:31:00 -
[4] - Quote
Khoul Ay'd wrote:
Okay, what's easier to remember Louis I - Louis XVIII or Andrew Jackson, Thomas Jefferson, etc. Name are meaningful, numbers not so much. Now add to that the fact that the roles for these ships changed significantly. It was going to really suck remembering which Iteron did what, and fortunately cooler heads prevailed amongst the devs. I for one am greatful to our CCP overlords.
I guarantee you that Iteron 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 was a lot easier to remember than epithal, kryos, miasmos, nereus and iteron v, for most people.
People won't sit there thinking "now which one is the PI ship, the epithal (iteron 3) or the..." they will simply show info, buy the ship and then forget about it until they need to but a new one.
If you mind works differently, good for you.
Putting work in since 2010. |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol
Polarized.
969
|
Posted - 2013.09.05 11:16:00 -
[5] - Quote
@ CCP Rise (or anyone that can answer), was the tracking of the artillery guns overpowered in comparison to the other medium long range weapons, pre-patch?
The 10% to ROF was pretty pointless imo. It only reduces the cycle time by 1 second and i think it would have been better if you increased the damage multiplier by 5% to play to the strength of artillery weapons.
Please reconsider this action.
Putting work in since 2010. |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol
Polarized.
978
|
Posted - 2013.09.07 13:59:00 -
[6] - Quote
A corp mate told me i'm too negative on the forums (i'm just trying to be constructive, most of the time) so i thought i'd pop in to say that i absolutely love the Deimos and the changes to rail guns! 
Well done balancing team!
I'm just here for the likes |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol
Polarized.
983
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 12:43:00 -
[7] - Quote
Oraac Ensor wrote:Rek Seven wrote:I guarantee you that Iteron 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 was a lot easier to remember than epithal, kryos, miasmos, nereus and iteron v, for most people. Please tell us what gives you the ability to do that.
Common sense.
I'm just here for the likes |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol
Polarized.
987
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 14:15:00 -
[8] - Quote
Oraac Ensor wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Oraac Ensor wrote:Rek Seven wrote:I guarantee you that Iteron 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 was a lot easier to remember than epithal, kryos, miasmos, nereus and iteron v, for most people. Please tell us what gives you the ability to do that. Common sense. If you had any common sense you would realise that you have no ability whatsoever to guarantee the working of anyone else's mind, let alone "most people".
So are you saying that random names are easier to remember than sequential numbering or are you just arguing about an irrelevant statement?
Of course I can't guaranteeing it in a "money back if you are unsatisfied" sense but i would put money on what i said being fact. It's down to you to disprove my theory if you think otherwise.
I'm just here for the likes |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol
Polarized.
989
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 14:54:00 -
[9] - Quote
Oraac Ensor wrote:Rek Seven wrote:So are you saying that random names are easier to remember than sequential numbering or are you just arguing about an irrelevant statement?
Of course I can't guaranteeing it in a "money back if you are unsatisfied" sense but i would put money on what i said being fact. It's down to you to disprove my theory if you think otherwise. I'm not sure that "irrelevant" is the right word, but my initial reason for posting was to object to your claim that you could "guarantee" how others think, but as you ask I would also dispute your theory about sequential numbering. If it were true it would apply in almost any other scenario, so let's try it: Instead of Gallente industrials, how about Gallente frigates? Are you seriously claiming that you would find them easier to remember if they were called Atron Mk I, Atron Mk II, Atron Mk III, etc, instead of individual names? What about RL? If you wanted a new car and went along to your local Ford dealership, you would find it easier to choose between the various models if they were called Galaxy Mk I, Galaxy Mk II, Galaxy Mk III, etc? Do you have family - aunts, uncles, cousins? If so, no doubt they have unique given names, but you would prefer Cousin 1, Cousin 2, Cousin 3, etc? I think not. [Edit] If you look at the original feedback you will see that at first I objected to the idea of new names but I'm happy with the way it was done. Keeping the Iteron Mk V for those who seem to regard it with some sort of strange reverence was a nice touch.
Your putting way too much thought into this and you're just being silly now... I don't really care to be honest, i just thought changing the names was a pointless waste of time.
I'm just here for the likes |
| |
|